And I Love Her

4
Your rating: None Average: 4 (1 vote)

Cover versions and notes on The Beatles' song "And I Love Her".

Provenance
Written By: 
Lennon/McCartney
Year: 
1964
Primary Recording
By: 
The Beatles
Lead Vocal: 
Paul McCartney
Cover Versions
Amazon MP3: 
Image of And I Love Her (Album Version)
Manufacturer: Verve
Part Number:
Price:
Manufacturer:
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her
Manufacturer: RCA Victor
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her
Manufacturer: Rhino Atlantic
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her (Digitally Remastered)
Manufacturer: RCA Records Label
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her
Manufacturer: Arista
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her
Manufacturer: Wayra
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her
Manufacturer: Duck Records
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her
Manufacturer: Planet Jazz Records
Part Number:
Price:
Manufacturer:
Part Number:
Price:
Manufacturer:
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her
Manufacturer: GuitarSounds
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her
Manufacturer: PMS
Part Number:
Price:
Manufacturer:
Part Number:
Price:
Manufacturer:
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her
Manufacturer: Phileo Music
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her (Yesterday Album Version) (Feat. Phil Keaggy)
Manufacturer: Green Hill Productions
Part Number:
Price:
Manufacturer:
Part Number:
Price:
Manufacturer:
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her
Manufacturer: Rhombus Records
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her
Manufacturer: SBE Records
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her
Manufacturer: Favored Nations Acoustic
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her
Manufacturer: CMH Records
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her
Manufacturer: Countdown Media GmbH
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her
Manufacturer: THE RIGHT STUFF
Part Number:
Price:
Manufacturer:
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her
Manufacturer: Ccr Records
Part Number:
Price:
Manufacturer:
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Him
Manufacturer: Bliss Tavern Music
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her
Manufacturer: ELAP
Part Number:
Price:
Manufacturer:
Part Number:
Price:
Manufacturer:
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her
Manufacturer: Channel Classics Records
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her
Manufacturer: Porter Music Box Co.
Part Number:
Price:
Manufacturer:
Part Number:
Price:
Manufacturer:
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her
Manufacturer: Enso
Part Number:
Price:
Image of Lennon: And I Love Her
Manufacturer: Deutsche Grammophon
Part Number:
Price:
Manufacturer:
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her
Manufacturer: RCA Victor
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her
Manufacturer: RCA Victor
Part Number:
Price:
Manufacturer:
Part Number:
Price:
Manufacturer:
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her
Manufacturer: Crescent Records
Part Number:
Price:
Manufacturer:
Part Number:
Price:
Manufacturer:
Part Number:
Price:
Image of And I Love Her
Manufacturer: GRP Records
Part Number:
Price:
Alan W. Pollack's "Notes On"

Notes On "And I Love Her" (AILH)

Copyright 1989 Alan W. Pollack
All Rights Reserved

The plaintive bittersweetness of "And I Love Her" derives in large measure from it's tonal ambiguity; is it in a Major or minor key ?

The song continually flip-flops back and forth between the minor key (c#-minor) and it's relative Major (E-Major). Another major point of interest (and source of ambiguity) in this song is that it makes a delicious modulation up one-half step at the beginning of the guitar break, but more on that later. Some quicky technical tutorial first because it will save time later.


Major/minor Relatives, and Pivot Chords

** Technical background on** Major and minor keys are said to be mutual "relatives" then they share the same key signature. (e.g., C major/a minor, F major/d minor etc.).

Implicit in sharing the key signature is the fact that they share the same chords, although each chord has a different harmonic/grammatical meaning (i.e., crudely put, a different Roman numeral) depending on which mode you're in. For example, in the pair of keys C major/a minor, the d minor triad is common to both but it's the II chord of C and the IV chord of A.

The ample selection of common chords in this situation makes it very easy to modulate between the two keys. Such chords are called "pivot" chords when they're used to effect a smooth modulation from one key to another. In terms of aural perception, one experiences such a chord initially in the old key, but within the following two chords, one retrospectively hears it as part of the new key; a kind of harmonic pun. **Technical background off**


Tonal Ambiguity as Seen from an Harmonic Synopsis

INTRO

The intro repeats the following progression of two chords. I think one hears it as a "weak" (i.e. non-dominant) cadence toward the Major. I won't dwell on it, but starting on a non-I chord in this context is itself ambiguous. Think about it, if you stop the song after the first chord, what key would you think you were in?

                f#       -> E
        E:      II          I

VERSE

So far we think we're in E major, but the next thing that happens at the beginning of the verse ("I give her all my love ...") is that the f#-minor chord moves to the c#-minor chord in a IV ->I cadence; this is repeated three times and I think one gets the definite sensation of being grounded in the relative minor. And yet, in the last line of the verse ("You'd love her too..."), we move from the c# minor chord to a straightforward IV -> V -> I cadence right back into E major again. All this goes down quite smoothly because of the pivots which can be schematically shown as follows:

        Intro                   Verse
        --- 2x-----             ---- 3x -----
        f#      ->E             ->f#    ->c#    ->A     ->B     ->E
E:      II      I               II               IV       V       I
c#:                             IV      I        VI

BREAK

The above verse is repeated and then we arrive at the break section "A love like ours ...". Here again, we pivot (this time on c#) in a momentary flirtation with the key of g#(!), then appear to be cycling back toward E on the words "near me", only to pivot back again immediately for the next verse starting in c#:

        break                                                   verse
        -----                                                   -----
        c#      ->B     ->c#    ->g#    ->c#    ->g#    ->B     ->f#    ->c#
E:      VI        V     VI                       III      V      II
                    g#: IV        I       IV      I
                                                              c#:IV     I

By the way, note how the contour of the chord progression in this break echoes in some way that of the verse; down a step, back up, down a fourth, etc. I don't believe that the composer actually sits there and conceptualizes this, but I also don't believe it's a random coincidence.

GUITAR SOLO

At any rate, the verse repeats again, then, instead of a repeat of the break, we get a verse-worth's of guitar solo. But not so fast -- in the instant in which the guitar solo commences, the music neatly modulates up one half step; if the original key pair was E/c#, we're now in F/d; from the world of 4 sharps to one of one flat.

Now, such upshifts for later verses have been a staple of the 2-minute love song since the fifties but this one is unusual because the first chord in the new key is its IV chord. It's a real attention grabber because it contains no notes in common with the previous key. In this specific case, we're talking about a g minor chord (g-b-flat-d) plunked down in a neighborhood of 4 sharps! A sort of triple cross relation.

Once we get a few bars further and the new tonal plane is established it's no big deal in retrospect; you'd have to listen to the song several times in a loop to necessarily notice that you've ended up higher. Nonetheless, the moment of impact of that g triad is special. If I got away with calling the WCWIO refrain a time warp, then this one is the harmonic equivalent.

CODA

There is one final verse following the solo in which everything is as before except that everything is a half tone higher, followed by a coda very similar to the introduction with one critical difference:

        g       ->F     -g      ->D *Major*
F:      II        I     II
d:                      IV        I#3

The song ends ironically on the Major version of the relative minor; I would half expect the sheet music to contain a ":-)" at the end. (This gambit has been around since the Baroque period in which it was considered dissonant to end on a minor chord so all pieces in minor keys ended in those days in this manner -- the fancy term is the Piccardy Third, no kidding.)


So What's *the* Answer ?

Which relative key is the song in; major or minor ? Consider the evidence:

  • the intro is in the Major
  • the verse is in the minor for more than half its length let always shifts to the Major at the end.
  • the break goes to a different key, comes around to the Major only to go right into another verse with its predmominant minor opening.
  • there is only one break section, but there are 5 verses including the guitar solo.
  • IMHO, the upshift modulation is irrelevant to the Major/Minor question and was added in to relieve what otherwise would have been a tedium of too many verses in a row without break.
  • the coda, while ending on the root of the Minor, is nonetheless a Major chord.
  • on the one hand, there are several strong IV-V-I cadences in the relative Major and none in the relative minor. On the other hand, I believe if you tally the total number of measures in the minor verses Major, then minor wins out.

If you insist on my making a binary decision, I'd hesitantly give it to the minor key "on points" (like a boxing match), but it's kind of moot; the ambiguity per se is what is germane here.

Regards,
Alan (awp@mirror.tmc.com)

---
"They tried to fob you off on this musical charlatan,
 but *I* gave him the test."